07-08-2015, 07:58 PM
(07-08-2015, 07:39 PM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Hollow Points are better, however, the Army cannot use them and obey the Geneva Conventions on warfare. They are specifically prohibited. The Nato 9mm are basically 124 grain +P rounds, but still ball.
The Hague Convention of 1899 had several protocols added later which include the ban. The U.S. never ratified that protocol but has been abiding by it willingly because apparently somebody thought ahead and decided that tying our hands may not be the best idea. BTW, in 2010 the Army had already approved the use of hollow points for MPs on bases and such.
(07-08-2015, 07:39 PM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Hollow Points are better, however, the Army cannot use them and obey the Geneva Conventions on warfare. They are specifically prohibited. The Nato 9mm are basically 124 grain +P rounds, but still ball.
The Hague Convention of 1899 had several protocols added later which include the ban. The U.S. never ratified that protocol but has been abiding by it willingly because apparently somebody thought ahead and decided that tying our hands may not be the best idea. BTW, in 2010 the Army had already approved the use of hollow points for MPs on bases and such.
The Hague Convention of 1899 had several protocols added later which include the ban. The U.S. never ratified that protocol but has been abiding by it willingly because apparently somebody thought ahead and decided that tying our hands may not be the best idea. BTW, in 2010 the Army had already approved the use of hollow points for MPs on bases and such.


Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
