02-07-2016, 02:23 PM
It's an asinine study.
Of course we more likely because we have more guns. We are also more likely to be killed during an auto accident because we have more cars.
You are more likely to die from a tornado in Kansas than Oregon, an earthquake in California than Illinois, and a gang member in Chicago than Dixon.
Utterly, completely, and in all ways asinine.
When someone kills you do you or your loved ones really care how? So they used a method at their disposal, so freaking what?
You take their gun, they kill you with a knife, you take their knife, they kill you with a car, you take their car, etc.
Like I said. Asinine.
Of course we more likely because we have more guns. We are also more likely to be killed during an auto accident because we have more cars.
You are more likely to die from a tornado in Kansas than Oregon, an earthquake in California than Illinois, and a gang member in Chicago than Dixon.
Utterly, completely, and in all ways asinine.
When someone kills you do you or your loved ones really care how? So they used a method at their disposal, so freaking what?
You take their gun, they kill you with a knife, you take their knife, they kill you with a car, you take their car, etc.
Like I said. Asinine.
Of course we more likely because we have more guns. We are also more likely to be killed during an auto accident because we have more cars.
You are more likely to die from a tornado in Kansas than Oregon, an earthquake in California than Illinois, and a gang member in Chicago than Dixon.
Utterly, completely, and in all ways asinine.
When someone kills you do you or your loved ones really care how? So they used a method at their disposal, so freaking what?
You take their gun, they kill you with a knife, you take their knife, they kill you with a car, you take their car, etc.
Like I said. Asinine.


Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
